Bomet Assembly Rejects Budget, Accuses Executive of Favoritism
Bomet County Assembly members on Thursday rejected the proposed budget for the upcoming financial year, claiming it disproportionately favored the County Executive at the expense of other critical sectors. The decision came amid heated debates over allocations to various departments, with legislators arguing that the Executive had prioritized politically sensitive projects over essential services. The rejection highlights ongoing tension between the legislative and executive arms of the devolved unit.
The move follows concerns raised by a special committee of the Assembly, which had earlier recommended disbanding the Public Service Board over alleged irregularities in the recruitment and appointment of county staff. The committee cited instances of nepotism and procedural breaches, asserting that these malpractices undermined public trust and effective service delivery. During the budget discussion, members also expressed frustration over lack of transparency and insufficient consultation with the Assembly before allocations were made.
Local political analysts say the budget standoff reflects broader governance challenges in Bomet County, where the executive and legislative wings have often clashed over resource control and accountability. The Assembly’s firm stance may push the Executive to revisit spending priorities and improve stakeholder engagement. Residents, meanwhile, hope that the disagreement will ultimately lead to a more transparent budgeting process that addresses pressing needs in health, education, infrastructure, and other essential services.