A contentious debate erupted on the floor of the National Assembly as lawmakers deliberated the proposed Kenya Information and Communication (Amendment) Bill, 2024, which seeks to impose stricter regulations on media content and significantly increase penalties for what it terms dissemination of false information. The bill, sponsored by a member of the ruling coalition, has been fiercely opposed by opposition MPs and media stakeholders who argue it is a blatant attempt to muzzle the press and curtail freedom of expression, particularly with the next election cycle approaching. Proponents, however, insist the legislation is necessary to combat misinformation and promote responsible journalism. The proposed legislation grants the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) sweeping powers to levy hefty fines on media houses and even suspend broadcasting licenses for content deemed to threaten national security or public order—terms critics say are dangerously vague and open to abuse. During the heated session, opposition MP Beatrice Elachi passionately argued, This is not about fighting fake news; this is about instilling fear in journalists and ensuring the government faces no scrutiny. We are sliding back to the dark days of media censorship. A ruling party MP, David ole Sankok, countered, stating, With the rise of digital media, we must have a legal framework to protect our citizens from malicious fabrications that can incite violence and destroy social cohesion. The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) and the Kenya Union of Journalists (KUJ) have issued a joint statement condemning the bill as unconstitutional and a direct assault on Article 34 of the Constitution, which guarantees media freedom. This bill is a draconian instrument designed to criminalize journalism. If passed, it will reverse decades of democratic gains and create a climate of self-censorship, read the statement. Major media houses have planned a series of editorial campaigns and public forums to rally citizens against the proposed law, warning of its chilling effect on investigative reporting and accountability. The future of the bill remains uncertain as it proceeds to the committee stage for further scrutiny. The opposition has vowed to challenge it through every parliamentary mechanism available and has threatened to move to the courts if it is eventually passed. International human rights organizations are also closely monitoring the situation. The outcome of this legislative battle is poised to be a defining moment for the state of Kenya’s democracy, signaling whether the nation will uphold its hard-won press freedoms or empower the executive with greater control over the fourth estate.
MPs Clash Over Controversial Media Bill Amidst Fears of Press Freedom Erosion
2
previous post